Calendar
Contemplative Practice in American Life: Shaping the Way We Work, Learn and Live
With Mirabai Bush and Arthur Zajonc
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Abode of the Message, New Lebanon, New YorkMary: The Future of Wisdom
With Robert Sardello and Cheryl Sanders-Sardello
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Abode of the Message, New Lebanon, New York
Tags
revelation, chivalry, cosmology, mysticism, dreams, inauguration, religion, unity, prophetology, interspirituality, Thomas Berry, dialogue, moral code, Judaism, Sufism, ecology, wisdom, universe, Earth, prayerPodcasts
Tag: moral+code
The Mystery of Love
One evening in Bombay, during a gathering of disciples, someone asked, “All the religions of the world agree that unless man recognizes his own self, he is incapable of any kind of ascent. What is meant by recognition here? Is it the recognition of man’s own being or the being of the cosmos?” Others asked similar things. Responding to the questions put forth, Pir O Murshid ‘Aziz Miyan Sahib, the revered, said that he would provide a condensed exposition. The discourse continued deep into the night. The gathering was large, with every faith, creed and denomination represented. The audience listened with heightened interest and some even penned down the oration. All that was recorded has been divided into six parts and printed. This is an abridgement of the first part.
The Iron Rules, Number One
Continuing our examination of various moral codes, Seven Pillars is pleased to present Pir Zia Inayat-Khan’s talks on the Iron and Copper rules of Hazrat Inayat Khan as an ongoing series. While this material originates from a Sufi context, it can be helpful to anyone who is looking for practical guidance on applying chivalric principles to the conundrums of everyday life. A new rule will be posted monthly until the series is complete.
The Iron Rules, Number Two
The second rule is: Speak not against others in their absence. This is a saying that, like all wise words, has several levels of meaning. On the most literal level it means: do not speak unkindly about people who are not present in the conversation. At a deeper level, one could say that to speak against someone in his or her absence means to speak judgmentally of someone to whom you are not present.


